TACAT

Parents Shopping for
Sophomore, Junior or Senior Years of College

Buy Report


Executive Summary

In examining the data present in this report, some strong conclusions are visible. First, there is a significant drop-off in the percentage of higher education purchases for sons in their senior year while spending on daughters increases. We also find, unsurprisingly, that these parents are also experienced shoppers; 87% say that they done additional higher educational purchase(s) in the prior 12 months, and while spending is primarily on sons and daughters, a small minority (4%) note that they have also spent money on their spouse. Additionally, when looking back on their purchase, the motivation for attending each year is different - with external pressure on the student substantially higher in their sophomore and senior years, while self-motivation is highest during their junior year.


When it comes to purchasers’ expectations of satisfaction, a large majority expects to be at least somewhat satisfied with their purchase--but a grumpy minority of 14% believes they will be dissatisfied. Shoppers who transfer tend to have slightly higher expectations of satisfaction.   Thus, institutions who seek out transfer students may, over a longer period of time, see a higher amount of repeat business and also see its reputation increase throughout the educational marketplace. Buyer loyalty is an issue with a large minority, as almost half of shoppers continually consider changing their supplier of education - including the shoppers who are very satisfied with their choice. When making the choice of provider, the very satisfied shopper appears to be better educated on the marketplace than the rest of shoppers. The very satisfied shopper also has a larger number of overall choices and put a larger number of educational institutions on their short list.




Conclusion – Executive Overview

The parents purchasing sophomore, junior or senior years for their children have strong segment identifiers as they progress through the college process. Traits like purchase motivations, financial aid considerations and transfer potential are all relevant for the various parents that make up this purchase populace. While it is understandable that buyers of freshman year act in ways that invoke typical behaviors of first-time buyers, it is surprising that there are such strong differences between buyers of sophomore, junior and senior years. Within this report, those differences can be identified, and most importantly, acted upon, to allow the institutions possessing this information to move forward as leaders in the quest to procure the right purchasers of education in the future.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Introduction and Licensing 2
2 Information about Purchases in the Last Months 6
Pages Concerning Parents Purchasing Upper Years, Combined
2.1 Higher Education Purchases in the Last Months 7
2.2 Type of Education Purchased 8
2.3 Identification of Family Member Purchase was Made for 9
Pages Concerning Parents Purchasing Upper Years, Segmented
2.4 Reasons for Making Purchase 10
2.5 Number of Good Choices a Purchaser Had 11
2.6 Number of Choices a Purchaser Strongly Considered 12
2.7 Delivery Method of Education 13
2.8 Elimination of Providers Due to Inability to Compute Out-of-Pocket Cost 14
3 Information about Purchases in the Next Months 15
Pages Concerning Parents Purchasing Upper Years, Combined
3.1 Type of Year Purchased 16
3.2 Delivery Method of Education 17
3.3 Out-of-Pocket Funds Planned to be Used for Purchase 18
3.4 Satisfaction with Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Purchase 19
Pages Concerning Parents Purchasing Upper Years, Segmented
3.5 Decision to Transfer 20
3.6 Consideration of Transfer 21
3.7 Identification of Family Member Purchase was Made For 22
3.8 Reasons for Making Purchase 23
3.9 Out-of-Pocket Funds Planned to be Used for Purchase 24
3.1 Borrowed Funds Planned to be Used for Purchase 25
3.11 Grants and Scholarships Planned to be Used for Purchase 26
4 Van Westendorp Pricing Analysis 27
4.1 Demand Curve for Parents Purchasing Upper Years 28
4.2 Revenue and Demand Curve or Parents Purchasing Upper Years 29
5 Demographics 30
Pages Concerning Parents Purchasing Upper Years, Combined
5.1 Purchasers by Gender and Ethnicity 31
5.2 Purchasers by Relationship Status and Age 32
5.3 Purchasers by Annual Household Income and Net Worth 33
5.4 Purchasers by Employment Status 34
5.5 Purchasers by Residential Status and Number of Dependents 35
Pages Concerning Parents Purchasing Upper Years, Segmented
5.6 Purchasers by Annual Household Income 36
5.7 Purchasers by Net Worth 37

 

Purchase this Report:

The 2010 Survey on Higher Education:

Purchase Behaviors of Parents Buying Sophomore, Junior or Senior Years of College for their Children

Published by Atenga, Inc.

July 2010, 37 pages

Hard Copy Print Edition (individual license):  $1,919 (delivery one week)
PDF License (organizational license):  $2,650 (delivery nearly instant)

CA buyers add 9.25% sales tax


License Price  

Hard Copy $1900 + $19 S/H

PDF $2,650