Executive Summary
In examining the data present in this report, some strong conclusions are visible. First, there is a significant
drop-off in the percentage of higher education purchases for sons in their senior year while spending on
daughters increases. We also find, unsurprisingly, that these parents are also experienced shoppers; 87% say
that they done additional higher educational purchase(s) in the prior 12 months, and while spending is
primarily on sons and daughters, a small minority (4%) note that they have also spent money on their
spouse. Additionally, when looking back on their purchase, the motivation for attending each year is
different - with external pressure on the student substantially higher in their sophomore and senior years,
while self-motivation is highest during their junior year.
When it comes to purchasers’ expectations of satisfaction, a large majority expects to be at least somewhat satisfied with their purchase--but a grumpy minority of 14% believes they will be dissatisfied. Shoppers who transfer tend to have slightly higher expectations of satisfaction. Thus, institutions who seek out transfer students may, over a longer period of time, see a higher amount of repeat business and also see its reputation increase throughout the educational marketplace. Buyer loyalty is an issue with a large minority, as almost half of shoppers continually consider changing their supplier of education - including the shoppers who are very satisfied with their choice. When making the choice of provider, the very satisfied shopper appears to be better educated on the marketplace than the rest of shoppers. The very satisfied shopper also has a larger number of overall choices and put a larger number of educational institutions on their short list.
|
|
| 1 |
Introduction and Licensing | 2 |
| 2 | Information about Purchases in the Last Months | 6 |
| Pages Concerning Parents Purchasing Upper Years, Combined | |
| 2.1 | Higher Education Purchases in the Last Months | 7 |
| 2.2 | Type of Education Purchased | 8 |
| 2.3 | Identification of Family Member Purchase was Made for | 9 |
| Pages Concerning Parents Purchasing Upper Years, Segmented | |
| 2.4 | Reasons for Making Purchase | 10 |
| 2.5 | Number of Good Choices a Purchaser Had | 11 |
| 2.6 | Number of Choices a Purchaser Strongly Considered | 12 |
| 2.7 | Delivery Method of Education | 13 |
| 2.8 | Elimination of Providers Due to Inability to Compute Out-of-Pocket Cost | 14 |
| 3 | Information about Purchases in the Next Months | 15 |
| Pages Concerning Parents Purchasing Upper Years, Combined | |
| 3.1 | Type of Year Purchased | 16 |
| 3.2 | Delivery Method of Education | 17 |
| 3.3 | Out-of-Pocket Funds Planned to be Used for Purchase | 18 |
| 3.4 | Satisfaction with Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Purchase | 19 |
| Pages Concerning Parents Purchasing Upper Years, Segmented | |
| 3.5 | Decision to Transfer | 20 |
| 3.6 | Consideration of Transfer | 21 |
| 3.7 | Identification of Family Member Purchase was Made For | 22 |
| 3.8 | Reasons for Making Purchase | 23 |
| 3.9 | Out-of-Pocket Funds Planned to be Used for Purchase | 24 |
| 3.1 | Borrowed Funds Planned to be Used for Purchase | 25 |
| 3.11 | Grants and Scholarships Planned to be Used for Purchase | 26 |
| 4 | Van Westendorp Pricing Analysis | 27 |
| 4.1 | Demand Curve for Parents Purchasing Upper Years | 28 |
| 4.2 | Revenue and Demand Curve or Parents Purchasing Upper Years | 29 |
| 5 | Demographics | 30 |
| Pages Concerning Parents Purchasing Upper Years, Combined | |
| 5.1 | Purchasers by Gender and Ethnicity | 31 |
| 5.2 | Purchasers by Relationship Status and Age | 32 |
| 5.3 | Purchasers by Annual Household Income and Net Worth | 33 |
| 5.4 | Purchasers by Employment Status | 34 |
| 5.5 | Purchasers by Residential Status and Number of Dependents | 35 |
| Pages Concerning Parents Purchasing Upper Years, Segmented | |
| 5.6 | Purchasers by Annual Household Income | 36 |
| 5.7 | Purchasers by Net Worth | 37 |